Long residence · First instance and appeal
Long residence cases are won or lost in the chronology. The correct analysis separates time that counts, events that break continuity and defects that may be disregarded without adding qualifying residence.
Discuss your position ↗The instruction
Technical advice on 10 year long residence ILR, lawful residence, historic gaps, section 3C leave, absences, continuity, refusals and appeals.
The correct strategy depends on the current rules and the complete facts. Early advice is designed to identify the decisive legal, evidential and timing issues before avoidable commitments are made.
How we assist
0110 year lawful residence calculations
02Complete immigration status chronologies
03Section 3C leave and outstanding applications
04Historic gaps and overstaying
05Pre and post 11 April 2024 absence rules
06Excluded immigration routes
07First instance evidence and representations
08Refusal, appeal, administrative review and judicial review strategy
The analysis
The analysis begins with a dated status chronology supported by Home Office records, passports, application evidence and decision notices. A visa-label summary cannot establish whether leave was extended by section 3C, whether a gap counts, or when appeal rights were exhausted.
Long residence now combines Appendix Long Residence with Appendix Continuous Residence and transitional absence rules. Time may fail to count without breaking continuity, while excluded routes and excessive absences can have different consequences. Each period must be classified rather than averaged.
A long residence refusal does not always produce the same remedy. The decision letter, whether a human rights claim was decided, the applicant’s current or section 3C leave, any variation under Appendix Long Residence and any certification determine whether the next step is an appeal, administrative review, judicial review or a fresh application.
Questions considered
No. Appendix Long Residence excludes specified routes and periods. Visitor, Short-term Student, Seasonal Worker and Appendix Ukraine Scheme permission do not count, and excluded permission can also affect continuity. The complete immigration history must be classified under the rules applying to each period.
Some overstaying may be disregarded for continuity under the relevant rules and guidance, but a disregarded period does not itself count as lawful residence. The facts, application date and rule in force at the time must be established precisely.
Appendix Continuous Residence preserves transitional tests for older absences, including the historic 184 day single absence and 548 day aggregate provisions. Absences beginning on or after 11 April 2024 are generally assessed against 180 days in any rolling 12 month period. The complete travel schedule must be divided at the correct date.
LR 11.3 generally requires permission on the current route for at least 12 months at the application date. LR 11.4 disapplies that requirement where the current permission was granted before 11 April 2024. Other requirements still apply.
Not automatically. A statutory appeal ordinarily depends on refusal of a human rights claim. The decision may instead attract administrative review, public law challenge or a fresh application. The decision letter and the legal basis on which the claim was considered must be analysed before a remedy is chosen.
Primary sources
Reviewed 26 August 2026. Immigration law and guidance change frequently; the current text and complete facts must be checked before action is taken.
Continue within this subject
A refusal, status problem or enforcement step should be analysed before a challenge or repeat application is chosen. Procedure, evidence and timing must be controlled together.
Initial position review
Quastels can identify the route, evidence, risk and next decision through a concise initial assessment.
Request an initial assessment ↗