A warranty that the target has complied with immigration law is not equivalent to production of a reliable sponsorship record. It may not disclose an inaccessible SMS account, a vacancy in a key personnel role, an unreported work location, a pay discrepancy or an acquisition that previously altered sponsor control.
The due diligence response should distinguish confirmed facts from matters still awaiting evidence. Screenshots, sponsor management records, worker schedules, payroll, right to work checks and previous Home Office correspondence may reveal different defects requiring different responses.
The buyer also needs to know whether the sponsor has been visited, audited, suspended, downgraded, investigated or asked to provide information. The existence of correspondence does not prove misconduct, but the correspondence may materially affect timing, operating continuity or valuation.
- 01
Licence evidenceCheck the legal entity, active licence, licensed routes, SMS access and the actual key personnel.
- 02
Workforce evidenceReconcile sponsored workers, contractual terms, payroll, workplaces, absences and immigration expiry dates.
- 03
Regulatory evidenceReview reports, Home Office contact, compliance visits, outstanding applications and known remediation.